2010 Easton Bat Reviews

The 2010 Easton bats are essentially the same models as in 2009. They have made a few wise modifications by adding stiff handle versions to their best selling bats. Last year their composite bats were called the Stealth/Synergy IMX this year they’re called the Stealth/Synergy Speed bats but they’re essentially the same bats. The minor modifications include a slightly lower swing weight and stiff handle option on their Stealth Speed two-piece bat compared to the 2009 Stealth IMX and a stiff handle version of the hybrid SV12. For 2010 they’re putting their marketing efforts behind the handle flex rating of their baseball bats. Each of their best selling bats are accompanied with a number, the higher the number on the bat the stiffer the handle. This continues Easton’s efforts to be the leader in communicating detailed information about their baseball bats. They tell us the handle flex rating, swingweight (MOI) and hitting area for all of their bats. This is extremely helpful in selecting a bat and makes me wonder why the other manufacturers ignore or gloss over it.Don’t forget to check out the My Bat Recommendations section for my recommendations on bats segmented by material and price.

Here’s Easton’s 2010 line-up:

Easton Composite Bats

  • Easton Stealth Speed 75 and 95: 100% composite, two-piece end-loaded bat. The Speed 75 is the flex handle version that is essentially identical to the 2009 Stealth IMX, except that it is slightly less end-loaded this year (swing weight rating of 80 versus 90 in 2009). The Speed 95 is the new stiff handle version of this Easton bat design. It is exactly the same as the Speed 75 except it has a stiff handle. The handle is stiffer than the Synergy Speed bat. Easton’s two-piece composite bats are by far the most popular composite bats on the market. Both the Stealth and Synergy Speed Adult -3 models retail for $399 a $20 increase from the 2009 models.

  • Easton Synergy Speed 90: 100% composite, one-piece end-loaded bat (75 rating) with a stiff handle (90 rating). This bat is almost identical to the 2009 Easton Synergy IMX, except the swing weight (MOI) was ever so slightly lowered (from 80 to 75). Eastonclaims this design provides increased balance and bat control through the hitting zone versus the Stealth model. The Synergy Speed 90 is aimed directly at the heart of Louisville’s one-piece, stiff handle philosophy. This design is far less popular than the Stealth Speed/IMX design. If you like this bat you should look for the 2009 model. It’s priced around $259 or $140 less than the identical 2010 model.

Easton Hybrid Bats

  • Easton SV12 65 and 90: Two-piece bat with a 100% composite handle, 100% alloy barrel and low swing weight rating of 70. The SV12 65 (yellow letters/handle) is identical to the 2009 model and has more handle flex than the Stealth Speed 75.The SV12 90 (red letters/handle) is a new stiff handle version of the SV12 bat. It has the same handle stiffness as the Synergy Speed 90. Once again Easton was wise to offer a stiff handle version of this bat. The stiff handle version was much more popular on teams swinging Easton bats in the 2009 College World Series than the flex handle model. I believe the stiff version will become a good seller for Easton. The Adult -3 models retail for $299 which is $50 less than last year’s price. If you like the flex handle option you can purchase the 2009 model (yellow barrel) for less money. It’s the same bat!

Easton Alloy Bats

  • Easton V12: One-piece, 100% alloy bat with the stiffest handle (100) and lowest swingweight (60) of any Easton bat. A solid choice for anyone who prefers an alloy bat with a stiff handle. The Adult -3 model retails for $199 which is a reasonable price.

Again, By far Easton does the best job of communicating detailed information about their bats making it easy to find an Easton bat with the characteristics you desire. Very, very smart marketing by the Easton people. Take a look at the My Baseball Bat Recommendations section for my bat recommendations in each category.

This entry was posted in Baseball Bat Reviews, Easton Bats. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to 2010 Easton Bat Reviews

  1. Joe says:

    Great reviews – thanks.
    I was wondering if you have any comments on the Anderson Techzilla XP bat for my 12 year old son. I was so busy reading about everything else I didn’t see anthing on these bats so maybe I missed something. Please advise if you know about this bat.
    Thanks.

  2. mike says:

    Good info,I wanted to know about the Easton Titan,mdl #BZ270, we went with this bat because of economics,and my son feels he hits the ball farther and crisper with a stiffer barrel vs the flex type bat,what do you actually think of the Easton Titan 33/30,,we bought it from a store that was closing,it cost $99.00 in the wrapper w/reciept,,please let us know if we got a good deal and a good bat,thank you for your time to reply,Mike

  3. kate says:

    The techzilla is end loaded. My nephew hits well with it and is 12 y.o. and weighs 90lbs. My son hits best with the Easton SV12. He is 11 and weighs 80lbs. A bat is a very individual choice. Do not buy what other kids hit well with because it may not suit your child. My son could not hit well with the techzilla….it was a lot of effort to swing. He hits effortless with the Sv12 and it is to the fence most times. Go with what is best for the individual.

  4. norm says:

    It all depends on the dad’s pocket book and the kid’s comfort level with the bat. So much of it is mental and there’s no proof a $400 composite bat is anywhere near 50% better than a $200 hybrid. With exception of the Louisville Slugger yellow Catalyst for little league about 4 years ago that almost every kid could hit home runs with that bat, it’s all a matter of preference (especially given the fact that composite bats crack or break much sooner than aluminum).
    And why do so many reviews claim their kid or nephew hit over .600 and went yard every other at bat since their dad bought them that overly-marketed latest technology “exclusive” bat?

  5. jake says:

    I got an Easton SV12 for my birthday, but I get a choice between that and a demarini voodoo. The Voodoo seems like it was from a couple years ago, and its 150 dollars cheaper. It has a black barrel, red letters, and a plain silver taper (you know, the part where its composite). The barrel is aluminum though. It would really really help if you guys could help me out in deciding which one is better, because i only have about 20 days left on the store warranty. Thank you very much.

  6. Kyle says:

    I got the easton sv12 so I could catch up to faster pitching. I did not liek it at first. My first round I hit it in the outfield once. On the fly. But even the second tme through it showed a significant difference in the amount of trampoline. I would recommend this bat to a friend. But I will tell them to be patient with the laque of pop in the first few hits.

  7. Thomas Byelick says:

    i got a 2010 Stealth speed this year for 300$. The cap caved in on the bat and it is just a tube of composite. I used my friend’s SV12 and the ball bounced off much better than the stealth. GET THE SV12!!! BETTER AND SAVES YOU MONEY!!!

  8. Tony says:

    I am 13 and my dad got me the Easton SV12 -3 with 75 flex rating. I weigh 125lbs and i am 5’6. This bat is very easy to break in, and once it is broken in, you can go yard ALL day. I play in American Legion baseball and I hit one last night about 280 feet and a mile high on an inside pitch. There is absolutely no vibration and it makes a nice sound when you really smash one ;). I highly reccomend this bat to anyone who is looking to buy this bat.

  9. zach says:

    well i was 11 and i took one swing with it on the field and hit a homerun.sounds great. might get it for high school

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *